to delete Palin post from Instagram
I suspect Instagram's deletion of Sarah Palin's post of her son Trig was politically motivated. The oligarchs were not protecting the public from seeing a proud mother's photo of her Downs Syndrome child. That was just the pretext they leapt at. What was really going on was that Sarah was being sent a message by the powers that presume to rule: Don't get any ideas about running for office. We're already pulling the plug on you.
It's true that some people complained about her post. But I don't think I'm wrong to say that a great many of the complainers were not parents of Downs children, but people looking for reasons to badmouth someone they oppose ideologically. And it's just silly to think that the Instagram censors weren't fully aware of the fact that political malice was behind much of the complaining.
The limousine liberals are very uptight with Palin. They know she's dangerous to their interests. She picked Trump as a winner right out of the box. And before that she added muscle to the Tea Party movement that so empowered conservative Republicans and damaged the Obama agenda. More recently she had the nerve to chastise Alaska's Sen. Lisa Murkowski, the only Republican in the Senate who wasn't a "traitor to her gender."
Only PC women are actual women, according to the "liberal" mob.
It's good to know that Facebook exerts its First Amendment rights as a media company. Hence it is not a neutral platform and can be sued for libelous or defamatory content, even if their representatives did not review that content. If Instagram were a neutral platform -- essentially a carrier -- then it would, like a phone company, have no say in the content of posts.
The post-midterm lame duck Congress has plenty to do in order to correct Big Tech censorship excesses.
It's true that some people complained about her post. But I don't think I'm wrong to say that a great many of the complainers were not parents of Downs children, but people looking for reasons to badmouth someone they oppose ideologically. And it's just silly to think that the Instagram censors weren't fully aware of the fact that political malice was behind much of the complaining.
The limousine liberals are very uptight with Palin. They know she's dangerous to their interests. She picked Trump as a winner right out of the box. And before that she added muscle to the Tea Party movement that so empowered conservative Republicans and damaged the Obama agenda. More recently she had the nerve to chastise Alaska's Sen. Lisa Murkowski, the only Republican in the Senate who wasn't a "traitor to her gender."
Only PC women are actual women, according to the "liberal" mob.
It's good to know that Facebook exerts its First Amendment rights as a media company. Hence it is not a neutral platform and can be sued for libelous or defamatory content, even if their representatives did not review that content. If Instagram were a neutral platform -- essentially a carrier -- then it would, like a phone company, have no say in the content of posts.
The post-midterm lame duck Congress has plenty to do in order to correct Big Tech censorship excesses.
No comments:
Post a Comment