Sarah's YouTube channel doesn't seem to have caught on. Its last entry was four years ago, with 500 subscribers. Recent revelations about Big Tech "shadow banning" (or the equivalent) make one wonder whether she was muzzled by hidden technocrats. But, of course, another possibility is that her approach didn't have enough zing to compete in the era of clickbait nonsense.
Anyway, here's an idea for Governor Palin. Why not do a five to 15 minute video commentary about once a week and post it on Facebook, with a link on Twitter? Now I have fled Facebook and wouldn't dream of trying to get past Twitter's shadow banners, and so I don't know what she's already doing in that respect. So, if this post is passe, begpardon.
Why do this? Because it helps build presence, and it is likely some of those videos will go viral and that others will stir media comment (much of it unfriendly, but that is to be expected).
She can then repost her Sarahgrams1 on YouTube, though she should expect that YouTube's liberal techies won't giver her a fair shake. Even so, post the videos anyway. Sure, silent suppression of actual viewing numbers will "demonetize" the account and rip her off. But, the videos will have still been seen, thus creating a positive impact on her behalf. (Admittedly, Big Tech's extreme shadow bans block everyone but the user from seeing the entry, without telling the user -- a practice that Congress should make illegal.)
1. It's fine if she uses that moniker, as far as I am concerned.
Anyway, here's an idea for Governor Palin. Why not do a five to 15 minute video commentary about once a week and post it on Facebook, with a link on Twitter? Now I have fled Facebook and wouldn't dream of trying to get past Twitter's shadow banners, and so I don't know what she's already doing in that respect. So, if this post is passe, begpardon.
Why do this? Because it helps build presence, and it is likely some of those videos will go viral and that others will stir media comment (much of it unfriendly, but that is to be expected).
She can then repost her Sarahgrams1 on YouTube, though she should expect that YouTube's liberal techies won't giver her a fair shake. Even so, post the videos anyway. Sure, silent suppression of actual viewing numbers will "demonetize" the account and rip her off. But, the videos will have still been seen, thus creating a positive impact on her behalf. (Admittedly, Big Tech's extreme shadow bans block everyone but the user from seeing the entry, without telling the user -- a practice that Congress should make illegal.)
1. It's fine if she uses that moniker, as far as I am concerned.
No comments:
Post a Comment