https://www.google.com/url?rct=j&sa=t&url=https://www.globalresearch.ca/where-swedish-warrant/5676006&ct=ga&cd=CAEYISoUMTIxMTE1MTgwMTE2NzM0NTE2MjYyGjg4NDY1OTdlZDllOGQwNjA6Y29tOmVuOlVT&usg=AFQjCNGbf0-0Cmsv8Zhk0FwedU7bgRuqIQ
Craig Murray writes in Global Research:
In the case of the allegation in Sweden that did fall through the statute of limitation, the accusation was that during the act of consensual sex Julian Assange deliberately split the condom with his fingers, without consent. I quite agree that if true, it would amount to sexual assault. But the split condom given to Swedish police as evidence had none of Assange’s DNA on it – a physical impossibility if he had worn it during sex. And the person making the accusation had previously been expelled from Cuba as working for the CIA. So tell me again – we must always believe the accuser?
Young chronicler of Troubles is slain https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/apr/26/lyra-mckee-obituary
No comments:
Post a Comment